Addressing tuberculosis through complex community-based socioeconomic interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic realist review

The established relationship between poverty and tuberculosis has led to the implementation of complex socioeconomic interventions to address poverty as both a risk factor for and consequence of tuberculosis.

Abstract

The established relationship between poverty and tuberculosis has led to the implementation of complex socioeconomic interventions to address poverty as both a risk factor for and consequence of tuberculosis. However, limited research to date has examined the conditions that facilitate the successful implementation of these interventions. We conducted a systematic realist review to examine how complex socioeconomic interventions for tuberculosis treatment and care were defined, implemented, and evaluated in low- and middle-income countries. We used a systematic search to identify published work that implemented complex socioeconomic interventions for tuberculosis, followed by a realist analysis informed by existing programme theories.

From a total of 2825 collected records, 36 peer-reviewed articles and 17 grey literature reports were included in this review. The realist analysis identified three main contexts (sociopolitical and cultural; relational and interpersonal; operational and administrative) and ten mechanisms that facilitated successful implementation of interventions. Overall, this review highlights the importance of political commitment in shaping sustainable programme delivery, the role of healthcare and community-based provider training in creating patient-centred treatment environments, and the opportunity to leverage operational research for evidence-based decision making to address the socioeconomic needs of tuberculosis patients experiencing poverty.

Authors

Monica Bustosa, Kathy Luua, Lincoln L. Lau and Warren Dodd

Introduction

Tuberculosis continues to be the leading cause of death from an infectious disease, with an estimated 10.0 million people developing the disease in 2018 (World Health Organization, 2019). The global burden of tuberculosis disproportionately affects populations experiencing poverty in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where most tuberculosis cases in 2018 were geographically distributed in South-East Asia (44%), Africa (24%), and the Western Pacific (18%) (World Health Organization, 2019).

Since the promotion of DOTS (directly observed treatment, shortcourse) in the 1990s as the primary approach to address the tuberculosis epidemic in low-resource settings, global strategies have evolved with increasing attention focused on addressing the social determinants of tuberculosis (Lönnroth et al., 2009, 2014; Rasanathan et al., 2011; Raviglione & Pio, 2002; Satyanarayana et al., 2020).

The relationship between the multidimensional aspects of poverty and tuberculosis has been well-established in the literature. More specifically, low educational attainment, financial limit-
ations, and a lack of livelihood opportunities that contribute to food insecurity, transportation restrictions, and poor mental health have been shown to influence tuberculosis risk and cure rates (see Appendix A). Recognising the connection between the social determinants of health and tuberculosis, interventions have started to address poverty and tuberculosis concurrently. Previous systematic reviews have shown the effectiveness of social protection and poverty alleviation efforts in improving tuberculosis treatment outcomes (de Andrade et al., 2018; Richterman et al., 2018; van Hoorn et al., 2016).

Download full research paper

The ICM community is full of people who care about effective, efficient, research-backed solutions in the fight against ultra-poverty. We would love to have you join us!

Stay in touch

Stay up-to-date on news, programs, and more by joining the ICM community.

Name(Required)
Name(Required)
Country